Friday, June 29, 2007

Evolution: The Scientific Panacea

If evolution plays as big a role in the change in species as science theorizes, then why do bats have eyes? Or why do they have sonar? Sonar alone is a technology that is extremely complex both in transmitting and receiving but bats have that ability as a natural feature. Bats emit sound frequencies that range from 50,000 to 200,000 vibrations per second. A step above sonar is actual sight. One can explain the function of sight but try to explain the evolution of sight. You can’t!

If evolutionists can't understand the above improbability, then I won't even get into how a creature would instinctively know that it needs to evolve extremely hi-tech low-weight components along with a perfect design to attain flight. Is evolution a viable answer to the creation of a Peregrine falcon? A creature that can fly (dive) at over 200 mph and create G forces that would rip modern airplane wings off?

How would any species know to evolve biological functions in which there was no previous model? Absolutely nothing but pure creativity. How would any species know what it is lacking?

In a world of sightless, non-feeling, non-hearing, non-flying creatures, how would the need to see, hear, smell, touch, evolve sonar or FLY become apparent? Or evolve claws, teeth, or a tail to swat flies? Science tries and tries to disprove God so they can become God. Now there’s an oxymoron!

If one believes in evolution then one accepts this fact: Intelligence exists. Intelligence comes from what, where or who? Intelligence, if not originating from some one or thing, then becomes the nature of the universe itself? That sounds a lot like God.

The knowledge to cause enhanced ability (or species upgrades) through changes in DNA is extremely complex. Chance chemical reactions? What universe is science gathering its data? It’s not this one.

I am not saying that species do not evolve, but there is a difference in accepting the theory of evolution as fact VS intelligent design. Evolutionists put their faith in man, Creationists put their faith in God. I've seen what man can do, I choose God.



Today's Pillory guests: Evolution.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Bill Clinton, the first "First Man" of our country? Heaven forbid!

Recently while talking about wife Hillary, Bill Clinton beamed, “When I met her more than 35 years ago, I thought Hillary had the best combination of mind and heart I'd ever seen -- and I still do. But it's going to take every dollar to make sure that Americans get to know the real Hillary, like I do. She's also the best candidate to beat the Republican machine. You know Hillary will never let a swift boat-style attack go unanswered...”

I suppose Bill’s “swift boat” attack during the Monica Lewinsky incident is not what he is talking about. One needs to remember that Bill Clinton is an impeached (sort-of) president. He lied under oath and was more interested in Monica than Hillary during his pecksniffian occupation of the White House. I would imagine his comment about Hillary would fit Monica as well. “When I met her more than a week ago, I thought Monica had the best combination of….”

Can we believe Bill's new found accolades regarding his sort-of wife Hillary? And is our country ready for Bill Clinton to become the “First Man” of the country?

As Bill hits the campaign trail on Hillary’s behest, one might wish to re-read the Clinton White House legacy. Is our country (or the world) ready to embrace Hillary as Commander in Chief? (However, some of the items stolen from the White House might be returned if Hillary moves back in.)

While one ponders the significance of another term of Clinton control, a word of warning is appropriate according to Evilwhiteguys blog, “If you're a woman in the White House (Hillary is safe) and are approached by Bill Clinton, know that he's immune to all but the strongest pepper sprays."

Today, the pillory welcomes Bill Clinton, possibly the next “First Man.”

Friday, June 22, 2007

A new Left by Clinton-Boxer (A.K.A. Thelma and Louise)

A new Left movement by the Clinton-Boxer Coalition to alter the definition of Free Speech!

Senator James Inhofe’s first-person report of a public conspiratorial comment delivered by senator Clinton to senator Boxer aired on John Zieglar’s evening show on KFI. According to senator Inhofe, senator Clinton is quoted as saying, “we need a legislative fix for talk radio.” By talk radio she means conservative talk radio like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh. By “fix” she means censorship.

Radio clip can be found here: http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2042.html

The issue at hand is one of market decisions. What sells and what does not. Conservative views sell while liberal or “progressive” (which is a buzz word to remember) views do not sell. This picture of senator Boxer (left) perfectly demonstrates the liberal move-on approach to communication while senator Clinton (above) demonstrates a liberal listening style.

It is a known fact that a majority of the AM radio band is dedicated to conservative issues. Does this fact give senators Clinton and Boxer the right to “legislatively fix” (censor AM Radio) this situation? Just the notion of legislating free speech is a paradigm shift away from what our founding fathers intended.

Are senators Clinton and Boxer more intelligent than those that signed the constitution? No, however these two are nefariously clever. Unlike our founding fathers who had the interests of our country at heart, senators (Thelma) Clinton and (Louise) Boxer are just trying to muzzle free speech to keep conservative viewpoints from swaying fence sitting voters into dexiotropic ideals. A desperate attempt to win the White House.

So where does their legislative fix start? Should the conservative AM bands be shut down or neutered? Maybe it starts by stifling the liberal Hollywood spin machine. Or is the liberal Hollywood spin cycle not the issue? Free speech for Liberals not Conservatives? Outrageous! But really from a Thelma and Louise perspective they know they are going to drive off the cliff anyway!

Among other progressive stances of questionable ethics, their quest for AM radio censorship, senators Clinton and Boxer have shown their true political fidelity. Communism.

Let us all welcome comrades Hillary (Thelma) Clinton and Barbara (Louise) Boxer to the Pillory!

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Bias, Bias and more Bias! Freaks!

National and regional journalists caught in their own bias.

In a disgusting display and represented significantly to the left at a ratio of 9 to 1, journalists have run their fluttering flags up the bias flagpole. (I'm saluting) The list is out and you might be surprised by who contributed what to whom. Surprisingly (maybe not too surprisingly) the list includes many of your favorite journalists. This list includes national and local news, news papers and other contributors to what we watch and read everyday.

Although too many names to include in this humble blog, the long list can be viewed here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113455#Cohen

My favorite contributing journalist is the New York Times Ethics Editor, Randy Cohen (D). Randy donated $585.00 to moveon.org. After he was identified as a biased journalist, Randy had the audacity to claim: “I thought moveon.org was nonpartisan and thought the donation would be allowed under the strict rule at the Times.” Randy, do you think your adoring readers are idiots? Yes?

This list includes both Republican and Democrat journalists that donated money to their party of choice. (Of the list 17 were R while 127 were D) What does all this mean? Well only three things:

1. If I donate to a candidate and then write articles about that candidate’s opponent, will I remain objective? No!

2. Will I be biased? Yes!

3. Can we trust the media? No!



The media is welcomed into this weeks pillory!

Monday, June 4, 2007

Jane Fonda is still a traitor! Not to be honored for anything!

Today Barbara Walters and Jane Fonda are welcomed into Dave’s Pillory. Jane Fonda’s inclusion into Barbara Walters’ book and television program titled “The Top 100 Women of the Century” has to be the biggest spit in the face of Viet Nam Vets yet! Jane Fonda is nothing more than a traitor to the United States of America. How long does the statute of limitations last for treason? If it has no limit then I should think that a revisit back to those charges should be in order. The following is an excerpt from RONALD D. SAMPSON, CMSgt, USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron, Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431

“ Barbara Walters is honoring Jane Fonda as one of the "Top 100 Women of the Century." Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during Vietnam. The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot. The pilot's name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat. In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School was a POW in Ho Lo Prison the "Hanoi Hilton.

" Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed, and dressed in clean PJ's, he was ordered to describe for a visiting American "Peace Activist" the "lenient and humane treatment" he'd received. He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward on to the camp Commandant 's feet, which sent that officer berserk. In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant's frenzied application of a wooden baton.

From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E's). He spent 6 years in the "Hanoi Hilton", the first three of which his family only knew he was "missing in action". His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed and clothed routine in preparation for a “peace delegation" visit. They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived. Each man secreted a tiny piece of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking each man's hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: "Aren't you sorry you bombed babies?" and "Are you grateful for the humane treatment from your benevolent captors?"

Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of paper. She took them all without missing a beat. At the end of the line and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POWs, she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little pieces of paper. Three men died from the subsequent beatings. Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.

I was a civilian economic development advisor in Vietnam , and was captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in 1968. I was held prisoner for over 5 years. I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in Cambodia ; and one year in a "black box" in Hanoi . My North Vietnamese captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Ban me Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried in the jungle near the Cambodian border. At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs.) We were Jane Fonda's "war criminals." When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi , I was asked by the camp communist political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received... and how different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as "humane and lenient." Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with my arms outstretched with large steel weights placed on my hands, and beaten with a bamboo cane.

I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released. I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me. These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who should be honored as part of "100 Years of Great Women."Lest we forget..." 100 Years of Great Women" should never include a traitor whose hands are covered with the blood of so many patriots. There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane's participation in blatant treason, is one of them.”

(Special thanks to Ronald D. Sampson for the above factual report)



Today’s Pillory Guests: Barbara Walters and (Hanoi) Jane Fonda.