Evolution: The Scientific Panacea

If evolution plays as big a role in the change in species as science theorizes, then why do bats have eyes? Or why do they have sonar? Sonar alone is a technology that is extremely complex both in transmitting and receiving but bats have that ability as a natural feature. Bats emit sound frequencies that range from 50,000 to 200,000 vibrations per second. A step above sonar is actual sight. One can explain the function of sight but try to explain the evolution of sight. You can’t!

If evolutionists can't understand the above improbability, then I won't even get into how a creature would instinctively know that it needs to evolve extremely hi-tech low-weight components along with a perfect design to attain flight. Is evolution a viable answer to the creation of a Peregrine falcon? A creature that can fly (dive) at over 200 mph and create G forces that would rip modern airplane wings off?

How would any species know to evolve biological functions in which there was no previous model? Absolutely nothing but pure creativity. How would any species know what it is lacking?

In a world of sightless, non-feeling, non-hearing, non-flying creatures, how would the need to see, hear, smell, touch, evolve sonar or FLY become apparent? Or evolve claws, teeth, or a tail to swat flies? Science tries and tries to disprove God so they can become God. Now there’s an oxymoron!

If one believes in evolution then one accepts this fact: Intelligence exists. Intelligence comes from what, where or who? Intelligence, if not originating from some one or thing, then becomes the nature of the universe itself? That sounds a lot like God.

The knowledge to cause enhanced ability (or species upgrades) through changes in DNA is extremely complex. Chance chemical reactions? What universe is science gathering its data? It’s not this one.

I am not saying that species do not evolve, but there is a difference in accepting the theory of evolution as fact VS intelligent design. Evolutionists put their faith in man, Creationists put their faith in God. I've seen what man can do, I choose God.



Today's Pillory guests: Evolution.

Climate Change: Changing science to fit agendas

When I had the opportunity recently to become violently ill from a stomach virus I knew that it was the bad cake I had eaten the evening before. However, no one else became ill from eating the cake, just me but it had to be the cake, didn’t it? Well, no it didn’t.

We as human beings react to stimuli in an interesting and almost psychotic way. If we vomit, what we last ate must have caused it! What else could it have been?

The virus I had quietly incubated for days prior to my becoming ill was the real culprit. But I was sure it was the cake I had eaten the previous night. The way some view climate change is very similar to this reaction. The weather is changing and we look for the easiest explanation for it to satisfy our hunger for answers. We need immediate answers to everything, even if those answers are not really accurate.

If the weather is changing, it has to be caused by man! Doesn’t it? No it really does not. If we all take a step (or ten) back from the sky is falling mentality of Al Gore, we might be able to slow down enough to make an educated decision. We may actually see other possibilities.

Human beings thirst for answers. We have such an ingrained genetic desire to know everything, that even science and physics will alter itself to satisfy that need. Unanswered questions leave scientists with a feeling of inadequacy. Many scientists think they have answers to just about everything so naturally the remaining questions get sucked up into the vacuum of theory. For some less initiated into intellectual circles, these empirical notions can then twist into fact.

My point; not all of what we see is fact. Not all of what we know is true.

Today's Pillory guest: Al Gore's Scientists

Dave